Yes, I agree my idea of God is as a force beyond human comprehension. Personally I have never believed in a personified deity, therefore I concur that God is making himself known, all we can comprehend is part of God, together with unknown amounts of what we can't comprehend. Is there some kind of intelligence behind this uncomprehendable being? Perhaps, but I feel it is a mistake to believe God is as simple as human minds and human religion make it seem.
I love Futurama's take on God: Where he is there, but understands that if he does too much, people become reliant on him and don't live full lives, but if does nothing, the world goes down the drain. He realizes that doing just enough to remain unseen is the best approach someone/thing of his power to take.
I think this could be related to this whole discussion on understanding god. Post edited due to language:
Interesting post but there's a couple of things I disagree with. Mainly the idea that computers are conscious or intelligent. My computer today is no more 'intelligent' then my primary school calculator, one just happens to add a lot more numbers a lot faster. Expert systems are merely the illusion of consciousness. Secondly the mentioning of Planck length, I'm dubious as to whether Planck length is a limit of our universe or our knowledge of it, but admittedly I don't know much about the Planck constant so I'll stop here. Retracting this statement since I was a bit confused as to what Planck's constant actually was.
Mmm. Not necessarily. It all depends on how you choose to define god. Some definitions of god may not fit the Above described. IE. God was a lifeless particle that exploded To create the universe we exist in. Sent from my Transformer
I see your point I guess, but this is a religous thread, so therefore we are talking about God/gods/goddesses/deities/etc.
Religion is a system of beliefs Intended to explain our existence and our creation. Ditto for science. Sent from my Transformer
I did not expect much more From one so simple minded. Everything that today is explained by science Was once explained by philosophical means. Many things in physics still rely on philosophical assumptions. Interesting, no? Sent from my Transformer