. . . Well, I know that now!! Ah, well . . . And - Happy Birthday, Wittle Woona. Or not so wittle, I have no idea. I'm not even sure what wittle is.
I haven't watched any movies since the Lego Movie... YAAAAAAAYYYY!!! Please tell me I'm Unikitty! /)^3^(\ I'm 20 years old!
Uh . . . What was the last movie I saw? It's been a while . . . Well, if you don't have to sit all the way through it, it was Ghost Storm. Which is bad not because it's about ghosts, but because it's a bad movie. But does that mean you're wittle?!
4/5ths?! I'd try for a smaller percentage. Well, if you want. I guess not every one wants to live as long as I do. Eh, guess I'll never learn what wittle means.
The Emperor's New Groove. I find that on tumblr, even the people with whom I should agree come off as being unreasonable. (i.e. tumblr feminists) Maybe it would just be cool to, I dunno, be respectful and stuff? Yeah.
To be fair, there are a large number of truly disgusting, perverted people on Tumblr. When you combine anonymity with very few rules, you're bound to attract that sort. Fortunately, from what I've seen, they're still the minority.
Most people on tumblr who have an "agenda" are just awful people. They simply can't find it within themselves to leave people to their harmless behaviors, instead thinking that they can somehow change people on the Internet if they wag their fingers enough. ...They can't, of course, but not for lack of trying. I dunno, there's just something about the smug, self-righteous atmosphere there that every time I hear "check your privilege", I want to crush someone's trachea. Shame, too. Seemed like such an awesome place to promote one's art. But if those are the type of people I'd have to deal with, then I'm better off sticking to dA.
NIIIIICCCCEEEEE. Luv dat movie. Weird, I've been happily using tumblr for months and haven't run into much difficulty. I only see the fringes of some of those stupid arguments. I think people are even able to block certain tags to avoid stuff like that, too, and I don't know how to even do that. I just follow the right people, I guess.
[video=youtube;D2g6ImqT4II]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2g6ImqT4II&feature=player_detailpage[/video] round round.
Feminist and Misandrist are two completely different things. I think the world needs one, and the other should die in a pit of fire.
The only "ist" that anybody should be worrying about (at least as far as society is concerned) is humanist. Separating people based on labels only leads to trouble.
And I completely agree with you. But I'm afraid people will still continue to use them. There's a 'label' for almost anything now, and if there isn't people will make one up, forever separating each-other into groups when in fact we should be focusing on abolishing labels and perceiving each-other as equals. But I think too many people rely on them.
There unfortunately seems to be a lot of overlap between the two thanks to third-wave feminists. But my ire isn't directed at the misandristic feminists so much as the misogynistic feminists. The ones who claim pornography is "objectifying" women, and that any woman who disagrees with their agenda to restrict female sexuality is somehow "anti-woman". The ones who fight tooth-and-nail to expose imagined/exaggerated instances of women's "oppression" in developed countries, whilst completely writing off things like women's actual oppression in the Middle East and the sex trafficking of children in third-world countries as "meh, cultural differences" or "nothing we can do about it". Not all feminists are guilty of these behaviors, as we should all know, but if they are prevalent enough to become the face of modern feminism, they are prevalent enough to be a problematic, counterproductive force that should be snuffed out. ...But no good ever comes of trying to expose these people for the anti-sexual, anti-human hypocrites they are, so I'ma just *bleep* off now and do...egalitarian things...somewhere. ^_^
