Any discussion of Evolution will eventually lead us to ourselves. Humans have been around for as long as we can remember, and yet the Evolutionists will tell you that we weren't. They will tell you that humans and chimpanzees shared a common ancestor some five million years ago, and that we "diverged" from that common ancestor and eventually invented the space shuttle while chimpanzees were only able to invent "the stick." To support this thesis, scientists tell us that we share 95 percent of our DNA with chimpanzees, and yet we share 99.9 percent of our DNA with Pirates. I ask you, who is the more likely common ancestor? And are the Pirates not the Chosen People of the FSM? Why do we spend so much time talking about something that didn't happen, while the FSM is dangling His Noodly Appendage right in front of our faces?
I sell memes on the streets to pay the bills When they see me walkin' in they all start headin' for the hills Got my ice cold stare that gives everyone the chills Now you back up mother bucker r'else you'll see how your blood spills
The thread slow down all the time, never long enough for someone to win though. Also Ned doesn't even equal Ray Stevens let alone Weird Al.
But I shall persevere just a little further, and I shall examine the human body—specifically, I will examine organs that have been deemed "vestigial," or useless, as a result of losing their function over millennia of Evolution. Fallacy: Emerging in adulthood, these teeth are thought to have served as extra grinding surfaces for early man, who, before the advent of proper dental care, would most likely have lost many of his teeth by his mid-twenties. Fact: It is common knowledge that our Pirate ancestors ate a diet much rougher and more manly than our diets today. Also, they tended to carry their knives set deep in the back of their mouths. It is logical, then, that they'd need extra teeth.
