I try to avoid movies that are "so bad they're good." If I wanted to watch a train wreck, I'd go sabotage some tracks.
Damn straight. The problem is there's a difference between films that are genuinely so bad they're good, and films that set out to be so bad they're good. The former were created by misguided souls who truly thought they were making something good, and contain real moments of unintentional comedy, and the later are just pos cashgrabs, like Sharknado.
I think everyone who knows of him has him on that list. Just out of interest, who else it on your list?
I won't give you the whole list, but it does include -Justin Bieber -Pat Robertson -Benny Hinn -Kanye West -The entire Kardashian/Jenner clan -Westboro Baptist Church -Hilary Clinton -Bill Cosby -Ahmed Mohamed's parents -Uwe Boll -Micheal Bay -ANYBODY who tells me that my rebel flag is 'racist' -Floyd Mayweather
I do get it, though. People got really upset after that flag walked into that church and shot all those folks.
The flag itself isn't evil or racist, in the same way a swastika isn't evil or racist; it's just a symbol. Symbols are assosiated with ideas and views though, and it's hard to argue that the national flag of the Confederacy has no connotations to racism. So if you're gonna be waving it around, I'd say it's on you to explain to others exactly what it means in your mind, otherwise you're just being deliberately inflamatory.
Not what I said. From a history stand point I find it funny that England stopped using slaves themselves but kept shipping them to the U.S.
I don't like defending the British Empire, because they did some pretty terrible stuff, but the slave trade was actually abolished by the British Parliament in 1807, 26 years before they abolished slavery itself, and 56 years before it was abolished in the US. British ships were forbidden from carrying slaves, and the Royal Navy enforced said ban, back when it was a considerable force to be reckoned with, so I'm not sure what you're saying is correct. If you have some evidence, I'm all ears, but it doesn't seem to tally up to me. Britain never employed slave labour domestically on the same scale as the US anyway, so I doubt there would have been many slaves to ship, even if they were allowed. The colonies were a different matter of course; I'm not saying that Britain's hands are clean, not by a long shot, but we do have a different history with slavery than the US does.
