EDIT: Ninjas If you wish to take this route, then phalacies ahoy! >You are just a troll who puts up straw men and nerdy catch phrases. So, You combat my supposed straw man phallacy with ad hominem. How very impressive. >I don't think anyone who watched that blubbering 2 minutes would honestly disagree with me. Ad populum there. Yes, the video is in fact rather pointless, as is this thread. This would have fared much better in a provate discussion, considering the number of people truly involved. However, just because you believe people would agree, even if they did, does not make this correct. Now, for my supposed straw man, I would like you to point out where I have presented your argument in a different fashion from how it was presented beforehand by you. If you can not provide quotes, good sir, I can not say your case has merit, as you may be simply editing the argument unconciously to better fit yours. Also, no, describing something with an adjective does not make it subjective. However, describing it with an adjective that states only your opinion and can not be proven without such is subjective, and you description was just that.
...regardless last time I checked any form of advertisement, which this blatantly is like it or not (regardless of it being good willed or not) Is against the rules, for exactly this reason. We don't want the drama. Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
