^ lies < wonders why there are no bb... thingys above the box where you type out your post. v wonders why i am jaret.
^ is yeti < is not confused v is not understanding the statement i am going to say now: The evidence that we have that we don't know something about doesn't mean it's absent. The absence of absence is considered presence. Presence is something we all know about. There are known knowns and there are known unknowns. How can there be known unknowns? There only can be unknown unknowns and known knowns. The absence of a theory about something that does exist is impossible. Known knowns are everything you see, yet there are 80% of things that stay unknown unknowns. The fact that you say there ain't something in the world is not to be considered 100% true.
